Actividades mediadas por ordenador para el mantenimiento de la atención y la emoción en la clase ELE online

  1. María Cecilia Ainciburu 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Siena / Universidad de Nebrija
Zeitschrift:
Lingüística y Literatura

ISSN: 0120-5587

Datum der Publikation: 2022

Ausgabe: 43

Nummer: 82

Seiten: 77-99

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.17533/UDEA.LYL.N82A03 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Andere Publikationen in: Lingüística y Literatura

Zusammenfassung

In this research we examine the results of integrating computer-mediated activities into online ELE classes. One hundred Italian ELE students took lessons based on two protocols: one of them, via videocall, and another one, in which the activities were interactive. We investigated the variables attention and emotion by questionnaires and other objective data, such as the absence of microphone or webcam, and we triangulated it with the scores of a certification exam. The modified protocol was mostly effective in maintaining the level of attention and fostering empathy in the group.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Anderson, P. (2002). Assessment and Development of Executive Function (EF) During Childhood. Child Neuropsychology, 8, 71-82.
  • Anderson, P. J. (2008). Towards a Developmental Model of Executive Function. In V. Anderson, R. Jacobs, & P. J. Anderson (Eds.), Executive Functions and the Frontal /Lobes: A Lifespan Perspective (pp. 3-22). Psychology Press.
  • Anderson, P. J. & Reidy, N. (2012). Assessing Executive Function in Preschoolers. Neuropsychology Review, 22(4), 345-360.
  • Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working Memory. Oxford University Press.
  • Bangert-Drowns, R. L. & Pyke, C. (2001). A Taxonomy of Student Engagement with Educational Software: An Exploration of Literate Thinking with Electronic text. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 24(3), 213-234. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/0CKM-FKTR-0CPF-JLGR
  • Bembich, C. & Paoletti, G. (2016). Un corso blended per i Percorsi Abilitanti Speciali. Percezione di utilità e distraibilità nell’uso delle risorse. QuaderniCIRD, 12, 315-330. doi: 10.13137/2039-8646/13297
  • Bruner, J. S. (1975). The Ontogenesis of Speech Acts. Journal of Child Language, 2(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900000866
  • Cárdenas Valencia, C. A. & Castañerda Patiño, J. C. (2020). Análisis de señales bioeléctricas como respuesta a estímulos asociados a la mediación pedagógica: estudio piloto. Revista Boletín Redipe, 9(5), 199-208. https://doi.org/10.36260/rbr.v9i5.988
  • Cataldo A. (2015) Limitaciones y oportunidades del Modelo de Aceptación Tecnológica (TAM). Infonor 2012, 1-6.
  • Da Costa, R. L., Borges, M. S., & Da Silva, L. M. (2020). Evasão estudantil: Processos de abandono de cursos técnicos a distância. Revista de Educação, Ciência e Cultura, 25(2), 173-186.
  • Davis, F. D. (1989), Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/249008
  • D’Mello, S., Picard, R. W., & Graesser, A. (2007). Toward an Affect-Sensitive AutoTutor. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 22(4), 53-61. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2007.79
  • Fearnley, M. R., & Amora, J. T. (2020). Learning Management System Adoption in Higher Education Using the Extended Technology Acceptance Model. IAFOR Journal of Education, 8(2), 89-106. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.8.2.05
  • Hsueh-Chao, M. H. & Nation, P. (2000). Unknown Vocabulary Density and Reading Comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 13(1), 403-430. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Unknown-vocabulary-density-and-reading-Hu-Nation/c9d67579b0ea5b638d12939c1824f26dfb01a8fa
  • Marina, J. A. (2010). La competencia de emprender. Revista de Educación, 351, 49-71.
  • Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The Unity and Diversity of Executive Functions and their Contributions to Complex «Frontal Lobe» Tasks: A Latent Variable Analysis. Cognitive psychology, 41(1), 49-100. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0734
  • Mora-Teruel, F. (2013). Neuroeducación. Solo se puede aprender lo que se ama. Alianza.
  • Mota, S., & Picard, R. W. (2003). Automated Posture Analysis for Detecting Learner's Interest Level. In 2003 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop (pp. 49-49). IEEE.
  • Neji, M., & Ammar, M. B. (2007). Agent based Collaborative Affective e Learning Framework. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 5(2), 123-134. http://www.ejel.org/
  • Pimperton, H., & Nation, K. (2010). Understanding Words, Understanding Numbers: An Exploration of the Mathematical Profiles of Poor Comprehenders. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(2), 255-268. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709909X477251
  • Prenkaj, B., Velardi, P., Stilo, G., Distante, D., & Faralli, S. (2020). A Survey of Machine Learning Approaches for Student Dropout Prediction in Online Courses. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 53(3), 1-34.
  • Real Academia Española. (2001). Interacción. En Diccionario de la lengua española (22.a ed.). https://dle.rae.es/interacci%C3%B3n?m=form
  • Sesma, H. W., Mahone, E. M., Levine, T., Eason, S. H., & Cutting, L. E. (2009). The Contribution of Executive Skills to Reading Comprehension. Child Neuropsychology, 15(3), 232-246. https://doi.org/10.1080/09297040802220029
  • Sun, Z., Xie, K., & Anderman, L. H. (2018). The Role of Self-Regulated Learning in Students' Success in Flipped Undergraduate Math Courses. The internet and higher education, 36, 41-53. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1096751617304542
  • Tao Barrios, H., Peña Rodríguez, L. J., & Cifuentes Bonnet (2019). Emociones y procesos educativos en el aula: una revisión narrativa. Revista Virtual Universidad Católica del Norte, (58), 202-222. https://revistavirtual.ucn.edu.co/index.php/RevistaUCN/index
  • Cervantes López, M.J., Llanes Castillo, A., Peña Maldonado, A.A. & Cruz Casados, J. (2020). Estrategias para potenciar el aprendizaje y el rendimiento académico en estudiantes universitarios. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 25(90), 613-631. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=29063559011
  • Venkatesh, V. & Davis, F. D. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
  • Winter, J., Cotton, D., Gavin, J., & Yorke, J. (2010) Effective E-Learning? Multitasking, Distractions and Boundary Management by Graduate Students in an Online Environment. Research in Learning Technology, 18(1), 71-83. doi:10.1080/09687761003657598
  • Wood, E., Mirza, A., & Shaw, L. (2018). Using Technology to Promote Classroom Instruction: Assessing Incidences of On-Ask and Off-Task Multitasking and Learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(3), 553-571.
  • Zelazo, P., Qu, L., & Müller, U. (2005). Hot and Cool Aspects of Executive Function: Relations in Early Development. In W. Schneider, R. Schumann-Hengsteler, & B. Sodian (Eds.), Young Children’s Cognitive Development: Interrelationships among Executive Functioning, Working Memory, Verbal Ability, and Theory of Mind (pp. 71-93). Erlbaum.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet