Most challenging types of offline inferences for Chinese migrants when reading public notices in Spanish

  1. Irene Capa García 1
  2. Susana Martín Leralta 1
  1. 1 Universidad Nebrija
    info

    Universidad Nebrija

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03tzyrt94

Zeitschrift:
Lengua y Migración = Language and Migration

ISSN: 1889-5425 2660-7166

Datum der Publikation: 2024

Ausgabe: 1

Nummer: 16

Seiten: 103-125

Art: Artikel

Andere Publikationen in: Lengua y Migración = Language and Migration

Zusammenfassung

Written discourse comprehension implies a complex inferential function. In this study, we analyse those inferences taking place afterreading (so-called offline), known to be elaborative and complementary. Following a non-probabilistic convenience sampling, we carried out a qualitative, descriptive study with 30 Sino-speaking adultmigrants living in Madrid. The POEM test (Ureña, Flores & MartínLeralta, under review) divided them in 3 equitative groups of initial,intermediate and advanced level. The objective was to identify the type of offline inferences most challenging for the participants when reading public notices in Spanish L2. The frequency of appearancein daily life of those notices and the level of proficiency were also analysed. Experts in inferences and in Spanish as a migration language validated the reading test. Results showed some relevant features of this reading profile and its didactic consequences to train the inferential skill.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Al-Faki, I. M., & Siddiek, A. G. (2013). The Role of Background Knowledge in Enhancing Reading Comprehension. World Journal of English Language, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v3n4p42
  • Alderson, J. C. (2000). Assessing Reading. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511732935
  • Allbritton, D. (2004). Strategic Production of Predictive Inferences During Comprehension. Discourse Processes, 38(3), 309–322. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950DP3803_2
  • Balota, D. A., & Chumbley, J. I. (1990). Where are the effects of frequency in visual word recognition tasks? Right where we said they were a Comment on Monsell, Doyle, and Haggard (1989). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119(2), 231–237. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.119.2.231
  • Baralo, M., & Estaire, S. (2011). Variables socioculturales y comunicativas en el diseño curricular de una certificación de español para trabajadores inmigrantes. Lengua y Migración / Language and Migration, 3(2), 5–41. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=519553951001
  • Baralo, M. (2012). Diseño de certificación lingüística comunicativa: ¿cómo evaluar la expresión e interacción escritas y orales? Revista Internacional de Lenguas Extranjeras, 1, 11–30.
  • Baralo, M., Martín Leralta, S., & Pascual, I. (2016). La certificación de las competencias comunicativas del español para inmigrantes. Porta Linguarum, 25, 105–117.
  • Barry, S., & Lazarte, A. A. (1998). Evidence for Mental Models: How Do Prior Knowledge, Syntactic Complexity, and Reading Topic Affect Inference Generation in a Recall Task for Nonnative Readers of Spanish? The Modern Language Journal, 82(2), 176–193. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1540-4781.1998.TB01191.X
  • Bengeleil, N. F., & Paribakht, T. S. (2006). L2 Reading Proficiency and Lexical Inferencing by University EFL Learners. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.3138/Cmlr.61.2.225, 61(2), 225–249. https://doi.org/10.3138/CMLR.61.2.225
  • Blanco Pena, J. M. (2013). Escollos lingüísticos de los principiantes chinos de español como lengua extranjera: Causas y sugerencias pedagógicas. Hispania, 96(1), 97–109. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23608457
  • Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K. (1973). Considerations of some problems of comprehension. In Visual Information Processing (pp. 383–438). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-170150-5.50014-7
  • Bruner, J. S. (1957). On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 64(2), 123–152. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043805
  • Burgoyne, K., Whiteley, H. E., & Hutchinson, J. M. (2011). The role of background knowledge in text comprehension for children learning English as an additional language. Journal of Research in Reading, 36(2), 132–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2011.01493.x
  • Cain, K., Oakhill, J. V., Barnes, M. A., & et al. (2001). Inference making and knowledge. Memory & Cognition , 29, 850–859. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196414
  • Cain, K., Oakhill, J. V., & Elbro, C. (2003). The ability to learn new word meanings from context by school-age children with and without language comprehension difficulties. Journal of Child Language, 30(3), 681–694. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000903005713
  • Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Lemmon, K. (2004). Individual Differences in the Inference of Word Meanings From Context: The Influence of Reading Comprehension, Vocabulary Knowledge, and Memory Capacity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(4), 671–681. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.4.671
  • Calvo, M. G., & Castillo, M. D. (1996). Predictive inferences occur on-line, but with delay: Convergence of naming and reading times. Discourse Processes, 22(1), 57–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539609544966
  • Chan, J. C. K., & McDermott, K. B. (2006). Remembering pragmatic inferences. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(5), 633–639. https://doi.org/10.1002/ACP.1215
  • Clinton, V., Taylor, T., Bajpayee, S., Davison, M. L., Carlson, S. E., & Seipel, B. (2020). Inferential comprehension differences between narrative and expository texts: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reading and Writing 2020 33:9, 33(9), 2223–2248. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11145-020-10044-2
  • Çokal, D. (2012). The online and offline processing of this, that and it by native speakers of English and by Turkish non-native speakers of English. [Ph.D. – Doctoral Program]. Middle East Technical University
  • Corbett, A. T., & Dosher, B. A. (1978). Instrument inferences in sentence encoding. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17(4), 479–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(78)90292-X
  • Cortés Moreno, M. (2014). Dificultades lingüísticas del español para los estudiantes sinohablantes y búsqueda de soluciones motivadoras. SinoELE, 10, 173–208.
  • Demir, Y., & Konya, S. Ü. (2012). The effect of background knowledge and cultural nativization on reading comprehension and vocabulary inference. Journal of educational and instructional studies in the world, 2, 2146–7463.
  • Dubrovskaya, T. (2012). Public Notices as Part of Linguistic Environment: Genre Analysis. In C. Conlan (Ed.), Applied Linguistics Association of Australia National Conference (pp. 302–334).
  • Elbro, C., & Buch-Iversen, I. (2013). Activation of Background Knowledge for Inference Making: Effects on Reading Comprehension. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/10888438. 2013.774005, 17(6), 435–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.774005
  • Escudero, I., & León, J. A. (2007). Procesos inferenciales en la comprensión del discurso escrito. Influencia de la estructura del texto en los procesos de comprensión. Revista Signos, 40(64), 311–336.
  • Escudero Domínguez, I. (2010). Las inferencias en la comprensión lectora. Revista Nebrija de Lingüística Aplicada a La Enseñanza de Lenguas, 7, 6–32. https://doi.org/10.26378/RNLAEL47127
  • Etaywe, A. (2013). Lexical inferencing strategies by learners of English as a foreign language - The case of Jordanian graduate and undergraduate learners of English as a foreign language.
  • Garcia, G. E. (1991). Factors Influencing the English Reading Test Performance of Spanish-Speaking Hispanic Children. Reading Research Quarterly, 26(4), 371. https://doi.org/10.2307/747894
  • Garnham, A. (1992). Minimalism Versus Constructionism: a False Dichotomy in Theories of Inference during Reading. Psycoloquy, 3(63).
  • Garrod, S. C., & Sanford, A. J. (1982). The mental representation of discourse in a focussed memory system: Implications for the interpretation of anaphoric noun phrases. Journal of Semantics, 1(1), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1093/JOS/1.1.21
  • Gernsbacher, M. A. (1995). The Structure Building Framework: What it is, what it might also be, and why. In Models of text understanding (pp. 289–311).
  • Gernsbacher, M. A., & Faust, M. (1995). Skilled suppression. In Interference and Inhibition in Cognition (pp. 295–327). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978- 012208930-5/50010-6
  • Goetz, E. T. (2009). Infering from text: Some factors influencing which inferences will be made*. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1080/01638537909544464, 2(3), 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638537909544464
  • Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101(3), 371–395. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.101.3.371
  • Graesser, A. C., & Kreuz, R. J. (1993). A theory of inference generation during text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 16(1–2), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539309544833
  • Hosoda, M. (2014). Generating Causal Bridging Inferences in EFL Expository Reading: Combining On-Line and Off-Line Processing. ARELE: Annual Review of English Language Education in Japan, 25, 239–254. https://doi.org/10.20581/ ARELE.25.0_239
  • Iza, M., & Ezquerro, J. (2000). Elaborative Inferences. Anales de Psicología, 16, 227–249
  • Kaefer, T. (2020). When Did You Learn It? How Background Knowledge Impacts Attention and Comprehension in Read•Aloud Activities. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1). https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.344
  • Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85(5), 363–394. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033- 295X.85.5.363
  • Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A constructionintegration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163–182. https://doi.org/ 10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163
  • Kispal, A. (2008). Effective Teaching of Inference Skills for Reading Literature Review Anne Kispal National Foundation for Educational Research. National Foundation for Educational Research.
  • León, J. A. (2001). Las inferencias en la comprensión e interpretación del discurso: Un análisis para su estudio e investigación. Revista Signos, 34(49–50), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-09342001004900008
  • Magliano, J. P., Johnson, B. K., & Graesser, A. C. (1993). The Time Course of Generating Causal Antecedent and Causal Consequence Inferences. Discourse Processes, 16(1–2), 35–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539309544828
  • Martín Martín, P. A. (2003). Genre and discourse community. ES: Revista de Filología Inglesa, 25, 153–166.
  • Mavrou, I., & Martín Leralta, S. (2018). Factores determinantes de la competencia comunicativa en español de trabajadores inmigrantes residentes en Madrid. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a La Comunicación, 74, 221–246. https://doi.org/10.5209/CLAC.60521
  • McDermott, K. B., & Chan, J. C. K. (2006). Effects of repetition on memory for pragmatic inferences. Memory and Cognition, 34(6), 1273–1284. https://doi.org/ 10.3758/BF03193271/METRICS
  • McGee, A. & Johnson, H. 2003. The Effect of Inference Training on Skilled and Less Skilled Comprehenders. Educational Psychology, 23(1), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410303220
  • McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Inference During Reading. Psychological Review, 99(3), 440–466. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.99.3.440
  • McMaster, K. L., den Broek, P. van, A. Espin, C., White, M. J., Rapp, D. N., Kendeou, P., Bohn-Gettler, C. M., & Carlson, S. (2012). Making the right connections: Differential effects of reading intervention for subgroups of comprehenders. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(1), 100–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.11.017
  • Moreno Campos, V. (2008). Sobre el concepto de inferencia: un diálogo entre Lingüística y Psicología. In S. Díaz & A. Goin (Eds.), Territorios en red. Prácticas culturales y análisis del discurso (pp. 159–176). Biblioteca Nueva
  • Narvaez, D., van den Broek, P., & Ruiz, A. B. (1999). The influence of reading purpose on inference generation and comprehension in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(3), 488–496. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.488
  • O’ Brien, E. J., Cook, A. E., & Lorch, R. F. (2015). Inferences during Reading. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107279186
  • O’Reilly, T., Wang, Z., & Sabatini, J. (2019). How Much Knowledge Is Too Little? When a Lack of Knowledge Becomes a Barrier to Comprehension. Psychological Science, 30(9), 1344–1351. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619862276
  • Oakhill, J. V., Cain, K., & Bryant, P. E. (2003). The dissociation of word reading and text comprehension: Evidence from component skills. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18(4), 443–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000008
  • Oxford, R. (2001). Language learning styles and strategies: An overview. GALA.
  • Paris, S. G., & Lindauer, B. K. (1976). The role of inference in children’s comprehension and memory for sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 8(2), 217–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(76)90024-4
  • Pearson, P. D., Hansen, J., & Gordon, C. (1979). The Effect of Background Knowledge on Young Children’s Comprehension of Explicit and Implicit Information. Journal of Reading Behavior, 11(3), 201–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862967909547324
  • Qian, H. (2017). Investigating “Unfaithful” Translations Via the Appraisal Theory: A Case Study of Public Notices. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ SSRN.2931961
  • Rai, M. K., Loschky, L. C., Harris, R. J., Peck, N. R., & Cook, L. G. (2011). Effects of Stress and Working Memory Capacity on Foreign Language Readers’ Inferential Processing During Comprehension. Language Learning, 61(1), 187–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00592.x
  • Ripoll Salceda, J. C. (2015). Una clasificación de las inferencias pragmáticas orientada a la didáctica. Investigaciones Sobre Lectura, 4, 107–122. https://doi.org/ 10.37132/ISL.V0I4.43
  • Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata: the building blocks of cognition. . In R.J. Spiro etal. (eds) (Ed.), Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension. Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Sáiz López, A. (2005) «La migración china en España: características generales». Revista CIDOB d’ Afers Internacionals, 2005, n.º 68, pp. 151-163,
  • Samuels, S. J. (1983). A Cognitive Approach to Factors Influencing Reading Comprehension. The Journal of Educational Research, 76(5), 261–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1983.10885463
  • Shin, J., Dronjic, V., & Park, B. (2018). The Interplay Between Working Memory and Background Knowledge in L2 Reading Comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 53(2), 320–347. https://doi.org/10.1002/TESQ.482
  • Singer, M., & Ferreira, F. (1983). Inferring Consequences in Story Comprehension. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 22, 43–448.
  • Smith, R., Snow, P., Serry, T., & Hammond, L. (2021). The Role of Background Knowledge in Reading Comprehension: A Critical Review. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/02702711.2021. 1888348, 42(3), 214–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2021.1888348
  • Songyang Huang, & Chunyan Liu. (2013). Working Memory and Thematic Inference Processing in L2 Narrative Comprehension. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 23, 19–36.
  • Soto, C., Blume, A. P. G. de, Jacovina, M., McNamara, D., Benson, N., & Riffo, B. (2019). Reading comprehension and metacognition: The importance of inferential skills.
  • Steffensen, M. S., Joag-Dev, C., & Anderson, R. C. (1979). A Cross-Cultural Perspective on Reading Comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 15(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.2307/747429
  • Tabatabaei, E., & Bagheri, M. S. (2013). Readability of Reading Comprehension Texts in Iranian Senior High schools Regarding Students’ Background Knowledge and Interest. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(5). https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.4.5.1028-1035
  • Ureña, C., Flores, M.E. & Martín Leralta, S. (Under review). Competencia comunicativa oral en español en contextos de migración: diseño y validación de un examen multinivel. Revista Signos. Estudios de Lingüística.
  • Valentini, C. (2008). «La lectura inferencial en lengua 1 y en lengua 2 (Francés). El caso del texto argumentativo». e-Universitas: UNR Journal, ISSN-e 1852-0707, Vol. 1, Nº. 1 (November), 2008, pp. 209-277
  • Van den Broek, P., Lorch, R. F., Linderholm, T., & Gustafson, M. (2001). The effects of readers’ goals on inference generation and memory for texts. Memory and Cognition, 29(8), 1081–1087. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206376
  • Wolfe, M. B. W., & Woodwyk, J. M. (2010). Processing and memory of information presented in narrative or expository texts. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 341–362. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709910X485700
  • Yuill, N., & Oakhill, J. (1988). Effects of inference awareness training on poor reading comprehension. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350020105
  • Zhang, M. (2009). Social context and translation of public notices. Babel. Revue Internationale de La Traduction / International Journal of Translation, 55(2), 142–152.