Adaptación y validez del Academic Self-Regulation Questionnaire (SRQ-A)en estudiantes españoles de Primaria

  1. Conesa, Pedro 1
  2. Duñabeitia, Jon Andoni 2
  1. 1 Universidad de Murcia
    info

    Universidad de Murcia

    Murcia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03p3aeb86

  2. 2 Universidad Nebrija
    info

    Universidad Nebrija

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03tzyrt94

Zeitschrift:
Electronic journal of research in educational psychology

ISSN: 1696-2095

Datum der Publikation: 2022

Ausgabe: 20

Nummer: 57

Seiten: 403-426

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.25115/EJREP.V20I57.6013 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen Access editor

Andere Publikationen in: Electronic journal of research in educational psychology

Zusammenfassung

Introducción. La evaluación de la motivación de los alumnos puede ser una poderosa herramienta para conocer los factores que pueden influir en el ámbito escolar, donde alumnos, familias, profesores, psicólogos o administración pueden desarrollar intervenciones relaciona-das con la mejora del aprendizaje a través del estilo motivacional basado en la Teoría de la Autodeterminación (TAD). El presente estudio pretende ofrecer una versión en español del Academic Self-Regulation Questionnaire(SRQ-A), uno de los instrumentos más usados a nivel mundial para medir la motivación académica. Método. Se realizó un análisis factorial confirmatorio (AFC) en una muestra de 1343 niños/as de primaria de 8 a 13 años. Para analizar la validez divergente, se realizó un análisis de correlación entre el modelo de cuatro factores del SRQ-A y para analizar su fiabilidad, se ejecutó mediante el alfa de Cronbach y el omega de McDonald. También, se testó su invarianza teniendo como referencia el género y el curso. Por ultimo, con el fin de analizar su validez convergente, se realizó una correlación de Pearson de los estilos regulatorios motivacionales con el nivel de satisfacción de las necesidades psicológicas básicas. Resultados. Se mostró una buena validez convergente y discriminante de la versión española reducida del SRQ-A ya que se observó una correlación positiva entre los estilos más auto determinados y el nivel de satisfacción de las necesidades de autonomía, competencia y relación. Un AFC de grupos múltiples mostró que la estructura del modelo de cuatro factores no variaba en función del género o del curso educativo. Discusión y conclusiones. La versión española del SRQ-A demuestra que es un instrumento fiable para medir la motivación académica descrita en la TAD en alumnos de primaria

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Albrecht, J. R., & Karabenick, S. A. (2018). Relevance for Learning and Motivation in Educa-tion. The Journal of Experimental Education, 86(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2017.1380593
  • Anwyl-Irvine, A. L., Massonnié, J., Flitton, A., Kirkham, N., & Evershed, J. K. (2020). Goril-la in our midst: An online behavioral experiment builder. Behavior Research Methods, 52(1), 388-407. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01237-x
  • Bagçeci, B., & Kanadli, S. (2014). The Study of Adapting Self-Regulation Questionnaire into Turkish. Journal of Education and Human Development, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.15640/jehd.v3n3a22
  • Beauducel, A., & Herzberg, P. Y. (2006). On the Performance of Maximum Likelihood Ver-sus Means and Variance Adjusted Weighted Least Squares Estimation in CFA. Struc-tural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 13(2), 186-203. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1302_2
  • Burgueño, R., Sicilia, Á., Medina-Casaubon, J., Alcaraz-Ibañez, M., & Lirola, M.-J. (2017). Revisión de la Escala de Motivación Educativa. Inclusión de la Regulación Integrada para Medir la Motivación en la Formación Inicial del Profesorado. Anales de Psicolo-gía, 33(3), 670. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.33.3.249601
  • Chen, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Beyers, W., Boone, L., Deci, E. L., Van der Kaap-Deeder, J., Duriez, B., Lens, W., Matos, L., Mouratidis, A., Ryan, R. M., Sheldon, K. M., Soenens, B., Van Petegem, S., & Verstuyf, J. (2015). Basic psychological need satis-faction, need frustration, and need strength across four cultures. Motivation and Emo-tion, 39(2), 216-236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-014-9450-1
  • Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement Invari-ance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464-504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
  • Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233-255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
  • Cokley, K. O., Bernard, N., Cunningham, D., & Motoike, J. (2001). A Psychometric Investi-gation of the Academic Motivation Scale Using a United States Sample. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 34(2), 109-119. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2001.12069027
  • Conesa, P. J., & Duñabeitia, J. A. (2021). The Basic Psychological Needs in the Classroom Scale (BPN-CS). Behavioral Sciences, 11(7), 96. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs11070096
  • Deci, E. L., Hodges, R., Pierson, L., & Tomassone, J. (1992). Autonomy and competence as motivational factors in students with learning disabilities and emotional handicaps. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25(7), 457-471. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949202500706
  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Be-havior. Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7
  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The «What» and «Why» of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
  • Dios, H. C., & Meléndez, C. P. (2005). Normas para el desarrollo y revisión de estudios ins-trumentales. International journal of clinical and health psychology, 5(3), 521-551.
  • Dunn, T. J., Baguley, T., & Brunsden, V. (2014). From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. British Journal of Psychology (London, England: 1953), 105(3), 399-412. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12046
  • Field, A. (2017). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th edition). SAGE Publica-tions.
  • Forero, C. G., Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Gallardo-Pujol, D. (2009). Factor Analysis with Ordi-nal Indicators: A Monte Carlo Study Comparing DWLS and ULS Estimation. Struc-tural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16(4), 625-641. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510903203573
  • Froiland, J. M., & Worrell, F. C. (2016). Intrinsic motivation, learning goals, engagement, and achievement in a diverse high school: Motivation and Achievement in High School. Psychology in the Schools, 53(3), 321-336. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21901
  • Gomes, M., Monteiro, V., Mata, L., Peixoto, F., Santos, N., & Sanches, C. (2019). The Aca-demic Self-Regulation Questionnaire: A study with Portuguese elementary school children. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 32(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-019-0124-5
  • Gordeeva, T. O., Sychev, O. A., & Lynch, M. F. (2020). The Construct Validity of the Rus-sian Version of the Modified Academic Self-Regulation Questionnaire (SRQ-A) among Elementary and Middle School Children. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 13(3), 113-131. https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2020.0308
  • Guay, F., Ratelle, C. F., & Chanal, J. (2008). Optimal learning in optimal contexts: The role of self-determination in education. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49(3), 233-240. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012758
  • Guay, F., Ratelle, C. F., Roy, A., & Litalien, D. (2010). Academic self-concept, autonomous academic motivation, and academic achievement: Mediating and additive effects. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(6), 644-653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.08.001
  • Howard, J. L., Gagné, M., Morin, A. J. S., & Forest, J. (2018). Using Bifactor Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling to Test for a Continuum Structure of Motivation. Jour-nal of Management, 44(7), 2638-2664. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316645653
  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424-453. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424
  • Iyengar, S. S., & DeVoe, S. E. (2003). Rethinking the value of choice: Considering cultural mediators of intrinsic motivation. En Cross-cultural differences in perspectives on the self (pp. 146-191). University of Nebraska Press.
  • Kröner, J., Goussios, C., Schaitz, C., Streb, J., & Sosic-Vasic, Z. (2017). The Construct Validi-ty of the German Academic Self-regulation Questionnaire (SRQ-A) within Primary and Secondary School Children. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01032
  • Lloret-Segura, S., Ferreres-Traver, A., Hernández-Baeza, A., & Tomás-Marco, I. (2014). El análisis factorial exploratorio de los ítems: Una guía práctica, revisada y actualizada. Anales de Psicología / Annals of Psychology, 30(3), 1151-1169. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.3.199361
  • Logan, S., Medford, E., & Hughes, N. (2011). The importance of intrinsic motivation for high and low ability readers’ reading comprehension performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(1), 124-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.09.011
  • Lucas, J. M.-A., Izquierdo, J. G. N., & Alonso, J. L. N. (2005). Validación de la versión espa-ñola de la Echelle de Motivation en Education. Psicothema, 17(2), 344-349.
  • Martinek, D., Hofmann, F., & Kipman, U. (2016). Academic self-regulation as a function of age: The mediating role of autonomy support and differentiation in school. Social Psy-chology of Education, 19(4), 729-748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-016-9347-9
  • Milfont, T., & Fischer, R. (2010). Testing measurement invariance across groups: Applications in cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(1), 111-130. https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.857
  • Oga-Baldwin, W. L. Q., Nakata, Y., Parker, P., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Motivating young lan-guage learners: A longitudinal model of self-determined motivation in elementary school foreign language classes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 49, 140-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.01.010
  • Ratelle, C. F., Guay, F., Vallerand, R. J., Larose, S., & Senécal, C. (2007). Autonomous, con-trolled, and amotivated types of academic motivation: A person-oriented analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(4), 734-746. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.4.734
  • Revilla, M. A., Saris, W. E., & Krosnick, J. A. (2014). Choosing the Number of Categories in Agree–Disagree Scales. Sociological Methods & Research, 43(1), 73-97. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124113509605
  • Ryan, R. M. (1982). Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(3), 450-461. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.43.3.450
  • Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examin-ing reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 749-761. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.749
  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000a). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000b). The Darker and Brighter Sides of Human Existence: Basic Psychological Needs as a Unifying Concept. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 319-338. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_03
  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2002). Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic-dialectical perspective. En Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3-33). Univer-sity of Rochester Press.
  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
  • Taylor, G., Jungert, T., Mageau, G. A., Schattke, K., Dedic, H., Rosenfield, S., & Koestner, R. (2014). A self-determination theory approach to predicting school achievement over time: The unique role of intrinsic motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(4), 342-358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.08.002
  • Vallerand, R. J., Blais, M. R., Brière, N. M., & Pelletier, L. G. (1989). Construction et valida-tion de l’échelle de motivation en éducation (EME). [Construction and validation of the Motivation toward Education Scale.]. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 21(3), 323-349. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0079855
  • Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Briere, N. M., Senecal, C., & Vallieres, E. F. (1992). The Academic Motivation Scale: A Measure of Intrinsic, Extrinsic, and Amo-tivation in Education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(4), 1003-1017. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164492052004025
  • Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Briere, N. M., Senecal, C., & Vallieres, E. F. (1993). On the Assessment of Intrinsic, Extrinsic, and Amotivation in Education: Evi-dence on the Concurrent and Construct Validity of the Academic Motivation Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(1), 159-172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164493053001018
  • Vansteenkiste, M., Soenens, B., Verstuyf, J., & Lens, W. (2009). `What is the usefulness of your schoolwork?’: The differential effects of intrinsic and extrinsic goal framing on optimal learning. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 155-163. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878509104320
  • Vecchione, M., Alessandri, G., & Marsicano, G. (2014). Academic motivation predicts educa-tional attainment: Does gender make a difference? Learning and Individual Differ-ences, 32, 124-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.01.003
  • Wang, C. K. J., Liu, W. C., Kee, Y. H., & Chian, L. K. (2019). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness in the classroom: Understanding students’ motivational processes using the self-determination theory. Heliyon, 5(7), e01983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01983
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet