The Causal Relationship between Individual's Choice Behavior and Self-Reported Satisfactionthe Case of Residential Mobility in the EU

  1. Díaz Serrano, Luis
  2. Petrova Stoyanova, Alexandrina
Zeitschrift:
Documentos de trabajo ( XREAP )

Datum der Publikation: 2008

Nummer: 2

Art: Arbeitsdokument

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Zusammenfassung

One of the most persistent and lasting debates in economic research refers to whether the answers to subjective questions can be used to explain individuals' economic behavior. Using panel data for twelve EU countries, in the present study we analyze the causal relationship between self-reported housing satisfaction and residential mobility. Our results indicate that: i) households unsatisfied with their current housing situation are more likely to move; ii) housing satisfaction raises after a move, and; iii) housing satisfaction increases with the transition from being a renter to becoming a homeowner. Some interesting cross-country differences are observed. Our findings provide evidence in favor of use of subjective indicators of satisfaction with certain life domains in the analysis of individuals' economic conduct.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Barcus, H.R. (2004), “Urban-Rural Migration in the USA: An Analysis of Residential Satisfaction”, Regional Studies 38(6), 643-57.
  • Bryson, A., Cappellari, L. and C. Lucifora (2004), “Does union membership really reduce job satisfaction?”, British Journal of Industrial Relations 42, 439-59.
  • Clark, A. (1997), “Job satisfaction and gender: why are women so happy at work?”, Labor Economics, Vol. 4 No. 4, pp. 341-372.
  • Clark, A. (2001), “What Really Matters is a Job? Hedonic Measurement using Quit Data”, Laobur Economics 8, 223-242.
  • Clark, A. and A. Oswald (1996), “Satisfaction and comparison income”, Journal of Public Economics 61(3), 359-381.
  • Clark, A., Georgellis, Y., and P. Sanfey (1998), “Job satisfaction, wage changes and quits: Evidence from Germany”, Research in Labor Economics, 17.
  • Chung, E.C. and D.R. Haurin (2002), “Housing choices and uncertainty: the impact of stochastic events”, Journal of Urban Economics 52(2), 193-216.
  • Freeman, R. (1978), “Job satisfaction as an economic variable”, American Economic Review 68, 135-141.
  • Frijters, P. (2000), “Do Individuals Try to Maximize General Satisfaction?”, Journal of Economic Psychology 21, 281-307.
  • Joong-Hwan, Oh (2003), “Social bonds and the migration intentions of elderly urban residents: The mediating effect of residential satisfaction”, Population Research and Policy Review 22, 127-146.
  • Kearns, A. and A. Parkes (2003), “Living in and Leaving Poor Neighbourhood Conditions in England”, Housing Studies 18(6), 827–851.
  • Lu, M. (2002), “Are pastures greener? residential consequences of migration”, International Journal of Population Geography 8, 201-216.
  • Van Praag, B. M. S., and P. Frijters (1999), “The measurement of welfare and wellbeing; the Leyden approach“, In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, and N. Schwarz, Wellbeing: Foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Van Praag, B.M.S., P. Frijters and A. Ferrer-i-Carbonell (2003), “The anatomy of subjective well-being”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 51, 29- 49.
  • Varady, D.P. and M.A. Carrozza (2000), “Towards a better way to measure customer satisfaction levels in public housing, a report from Cincinnati”, Housing Studies 15, 797-825.
  • Veenhoven, R. (1996), “Developments in satisfaction-research”, Social Indicators Research 37, 1-46.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet