Oral debates in Spanish as an Additional Language classroomassessment criteria to improve student performance

  1. García Balsas, Marta
  2. López-Ferrero, Carmen 1
  1. 1 Universitat Pompeu Fabra
    info

    Universitat Pompeu Fabra

    Barcelona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04n0g0b29

Revista:
Porta Linguarum: revista internacional de didáctica de las lenguas extranjeras

ISSN: 1697-7467

Año de publicación: 2023

Número: 39

Páginas: 147-164

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.30827/PORTALIN.VI39.23533 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Porta Linguarum: revista internacional de didáctica de las lenguas extranjeras

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

The oral debate is a classroom discourse genre commonly used to assess the interactional competence of language learners. Nevertheless, its multidimensional features are often not explicitly spelled out to students, and empirical data related to student performance of this genre has thus far received little attention in the literature. With these two issues in mind, a group of Australian students of Spanish as an Additional Language were audio-recorded as they performed during two oral debates, one a practice session, the other a final debate intended to showcase their oral interaction skills for assessment purposes. Between the two debates, the students received feedback from classmates and their instructor on their preliminary debate performance, and the criteria and indicators of achievement by which their final debate performance would be judged were discussed with them. Transcripts of the two debates were subjected to thematic analysis and the results compared. This comparison revealed improvements in student debate performance, especially in terms of effective turn-requesting and turn-alternation. A second outcome was the elaboration of a revised, more detailed set of criteria for assessing the performance in oral debates of upper intermediate-level students, an instrument which will be useful in any Additional Language context

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Acosta, L. (2020). El uso del debate estructurado en clase como herramienta para desarrollar el pensamiento crítico en la clase de ELE. In A. Lallana, L. Hernández Martín y M. Fuertes Gutiérrez (Eds), Five years of ELEUK conferences: a selection of short papers from 2019 (pp. 55-65). Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/ rpnet.2020.41.1075
  • Acosta Ortega, L. (2019). La competencia interaccional de estudiantes de ELE. Gestión de turnos en actividades de interacción oral [Doctoral dissertation, Universitat Pompeu]. TDX Repository. https://www.tdx.cat/handle/10803/668237#page=1
  • Briz, A., & Grupo Val.Es.Co. (2000). ¿Cómo se comenta un texto coloquial? Ariel Practicum.
  • Bustos Gisbert, J. M. & Sánchez Iglesias, J. J. (2020). La competencia discursiva en español LE/L2: la cohesión. Archiletras Científica: Revista de Investigación de Lengua y Letras, 4.
  • Calsamiglia, H., Cots, J.M., Nussbaum, L., Payrató, L., & Tusón, A. (1994). Estrategias comunicativas e identidades socioculturales en talk shows: un ejemplo de “La vida en un xip”. Sintagma. Revista de Lingüística, 6, 39-50.
  • Cañada, M.D., & López Ferrero, C. (2019). Oral discourse competence-in-performance: analysing learner dialogues. Language & Dialogue, vol. 9(2), 236-263.
  • Carless, D. & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 43(8), 1315-1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
  • Cestero, A.M. (2005). Conversación y enseñanza de lenguas extranjeras. Arco/Libros.
  • Council of Europe (2001). Marco común europeo de referencia para las lenguas: aprendizaje, enseñanza, evaluación. MECD-Subdirección General de Información y Publicaciones, & Grupo ANAYA, S.A., 2002.
  • Council of Europe (2020). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment - Companion volume. https://rm.coe.int/common-european-framework-of-reference-for-languages-learning-teaching/16809ea0d4
  • Cortés Rodríguez, L. & Muñio Valverde, J.L. (2012). Mejore su discurso oral. Universidad de Almería.
  • Cortés Rodríguez, L. & Sánchez Villanueva, A. (2021). Mecanismos arquitectónicos en el momento estelar de un debate: el minuto de cierre o minuto de oro. In S. Ridao & Y. González (Eds.), Estudios filológicos lingüísticos: Homenaje al profesor Manuel Peñalver Castillo, (pp.139-153). Comares.
  • Duarte Infante, Á.V., Fonseca Velandia, S.M., & Ramos Holguín, B. (2020). Debates about educational issues: A pedagogical strategy to explore argumentative skills in the efl classroom. HOW, 27(1), 49-67.
  • Flick, U. (2009). An introduction to qualitative research (4th ed.). SAGE.
  • Galaczi, E., & Taylor, L. (2018). Interactional competence: Conceptualisations, operationalisations, and outstanding questions. Language Assessment Quarterly, 15(3), 219-236. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2018.1453816
  • Gallardo Paúls, B. (1998). Comentario de textos conversacionales. I. De la teoría al comentario. Arco/Libros.
  • Gibbs, G. (2012). El análisis de datos cualitativos en investigación cualitativa. Morata.
  • Han, Y. & Xu, Y. (2020). The development of student feedback literacy: the influences of teacher feedback on peer feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(5), 680-696.
  • Instituto Cervantes (2006). Plan curricular del Instituto Cervantes. Madrid: Biblioteca nueva. https://cvc.cervantes.es/ensenanza/biblioteca_ele/plan_curricular/
  • Martín Peris, Ernesto; López Ferrero, Carmen & Bach, Carme (2021). Plurilingual discourse competence: Assessing genres at the threshold level. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice, 15(3), 265-287. DOI: 10.1558/jalpp.21052
  • Martín Soria, C. (2013). Técnicas de debate en la clase de ELE. Análisis de un caso práctico. In A. Blas Nieves et al. (eds.). Proceedings of the I Congreso Internacional de Didáctica de Español como Lengua Extranjera del Instituto Cervantes de Budapest (pp.263-270). Instituto Cervantes de Budapest.
  • May, L., Nakatsuhara, F., Lam, D., & Galaczi, E. (2020). Developing tools for learning oriented assessment of interactional competence: Bridging theory and practice. Language Testing, 37(2), 165-188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532219879044
  • Merzlikina O. (2021). Estrategias de comunicación en la interacción oral en contextos de aprendizaje formal: análisis de manuales. Porta Linguarum, 37, 161-176.https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.vi37.16727
  • Moreno Fernández, F. (2002). Producción, expresión e interacción oral. Arco Libros.
  • Nakatsuhara, F., May, L., Lam, D., & Galaczi, E. (2018). Learning oriented feedback in the development and assessment of interactional competence. Research Notes, 70, 1-68. https://www.cambridgeenglish.org/Images/517543-research-notes-70.pdf
  • Nguyen, T.H. (2017). EFL Vietnamese learners’ engagement with English language during oral classroom peer interaction [Doctoral dissertation, University of Wollongong]. University of Wollongong Repository. https://ro.uow.edu.au/theses1/107
  • Nussbaum, L. 1995. Observación de los usos orales en el aula y reflexión metacomunicativa. Textos de didáctica de la lengua y la Literatura, 3, 33-41.
  • López Ferrero, Carmen; Martín Peris, Ernesto; Esteve Ruescas, Olga & Atienza Cerezo, Encarna (2019). La competencia discursiva en sus constelaciones: glosario. https://www.upf.edu/web/ecodal/glosario
  • Loureda, Ó. & Schrott, A. (2021). Manual de lingüística del hablar. De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110335224
  • Paltridge, B. (2001). Genre and the language learning classroom. University of Michigan Press.
  • Pérez Ruiz, J. (2016). Contenidos socioculturales en la temática conversacional de un corpus oral bilingüe chino-español de estudiantes de Español Lengua Extranjera. Porta Linguarum, 25, 63-77.
  • Stobart, G. & Hopfenbeck, T.N. (2014). Assessment for learning and formative assessment. In J. Baird et al. (eds.), State of the field review of assessment and learning (pp. 30-50). Norwegian Knowledge Centre for Education.
  • Swales, J. (1996). Occluded genres in the academy: The case of the submission letter. In E. Ventola & A. Mauranen (eds.). Academia writing. Intercultural and textual issues, (pp. 45-58). John Benjamins.
  • Van Lier, L. (1989). Reeling, writhing, drawling, stretching, and fainting in coils: oral proficiency interviews as conversation. TESOL Quarterly, 23, 489-508. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586922.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet