Medidas de longitud en la investigación empírica de ASL¿Medidas de complejidad sintáctica o de fluidez?

  1. Irini Mavrou
  2. María Cecilia Ainciburu
Zeitschrift:
Revista española de lingüística aplicada

ISSN: 0213-2028

Datum der Publikation: 2019

Ausgabe: 32

Nummer: 1

Seiten: 125-154

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.1075/RESLA.15028.MAV DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Andere Publikationen in: Revista española de lingüística aplicada

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Bardovi-Harlig, K. , y Bofman, T. (1988) A second look at T-unit analysis. Comunicación presentada en 22ndAnnual Meeting of the Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, Chicago, IL. Disponible en: files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED295478.pdf
  • Bulté, B. , y Housen, A. (2012) Defining and operationalising L2 complexity. En A. Housen , F. Kuiken , y I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency. Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (pp.21–46). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.32.02bul https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.32.02bul
  • Celaya, M. L. , Pérez-Vidal, C. , y Torras, M. R. (2000/2001) Matriz de criterios de medición para la determinación del perfil de competencia lingüística escrita en inglés (LE). RESLA, 14, 87–98.
  • Checa García, I. (2005) Medidas de madurez sintáctica aplicadas a lecturas de ELE. Interlingüística, 16(1), 273–285.
  • Conway, J. M. , y Huffcutt, A. I. (2003) A review and evaluation of exploratory factor analysis practices in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 6(2), 147–168. doi:  10.1177/1094428103251541 https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428103251541
  • Costello, A. B. , y Osborne, J. W. (2005) Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(7). Disponible en: pareonline.net/pdf/v10n7.pdf
  • Cowan, N. (2001) The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(1), 87–115. doi:  10.1017/S0140525X01003922 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X01003922
  • DeKeyser, R. (2016) Of moving targets and chameleons: Why the concept of difficulty is so hard to pin down. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(2), 353–363. doi:  10.1017/S0272263116000024 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263116000024
  • Dewaele, J. M. , y Pavlenko, A. (2003) Productivity and lexical diversity in native and non-native speech: A study of cross-cultural effects. En V. Cook (Ed.), Effects of the second language on the first (pp.120–141). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781853596346‑009 https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853596346-009
  • de Winter, J. C. F. , Dodou, D. , y Wieringa, P. A. (2009) Exploratory factor analysis with small sample sizes. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 44, 147–181. doi:  10.1080/00273170902794206 https://doi.org/10.1080/00273170902794206
  • Fabrigar, L. R. , Wegener, D. T. , MacCallum, R. C. , y Strahan, E. J. (1999) Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299. doi:  10.1037/1082‑989X.4.3.272 https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272
  • Fidell, L. S. , y Tabachnick, B. G. (2003) Preparatory data analysis. En I. B. Weiner , J. A. Schinka , y W. F. Velicer (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Research methods in psychology (Vol.2, pp.115–141). New York: Wiley. 10.1002/0471264385.wei0205 https://doi.org/10.1002/0471264385.wei0205
  • Field, A. (2009) Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). London, UK: SAGE Publications.
  • Foster, P. , Tonkyn, A. , y Wigglesworth, G. (2000) Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics, 21(3), 354–375. doi:  10.1093/applin/21.3.354 https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.3.354
  • Gilabert, R. (2005) Task complexity and L2 narrative oral production (Tesis doctoral inédita, Universitat de Barcelona). Disponible en: hdl.handle.net/2445/35007
  • Hair, J. F. Jr. , Black, W. C. , Babin, B. J. , y Anderson, R. E. (2010) Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Holmes, D. I. (1985) The analysis of literary style: A review. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A (General), 148(4), 328–341. doi:  10.2307/2981893 https://doi.org/10.2307/2981893
  • Housen, A. , y Kuiken, F. (2009) Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in Second Language Acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 461–473. doi:  10.1093/applin/amp048 https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp048
  • Housen, A. , Kuiken, F. , y Vedder, I. (2012) Complexity, accuracy and fluency: Definitions, measurement and research. En A. Housen , F. Kuiken , y I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency. Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (pp.1–20). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.32.01hou https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.32.01hou
  • Hunt, K. W. (1965) Grammatical structures written at three grade levels. NCTE Research Report No. 3. Champaign, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
  • Johansson, V. (2008) Lexical diversity and lexical density in speech and writing: A developmental perspective. Lund Working Papers in Linguistics, 53, 61–79.
  • Kobayashi, M. (2009) Hitting the mark: How can text organisation and response format affect reading test performance?New York: Peter Lang.
  • Kormos, J. (2011) Task complexity and linguistic and discourse features of narrative writing performance. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20, 148–161. doi:  10.1016/j.jslw.2011.02.001 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2011.02.001
  • Kormos, J. , y Dénes, M. (2004) Exploring measures and perceptions of fluency in the speech of second language learners. System, 32(2), 146–164. 10.1016/j.system.2004.01.001 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.01.001
  • Kormos, J. , y Trebits, A. (2012) The role of task complexity, modality, and aptitude in narrative task performance. Language Learning, 62(2), 439–472. doi:  10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2012.00695.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00695.x
  • Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006) The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 590–619. doi:  10.1093/applin/aml029 https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml029
  • (2009) Adjusting expectations: The study of complexity, accuracy, and fluency in Second Language Acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 579–589. doi:  10.1093/applin/amp043 https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp043
  • Laufer, B. , y Nation, P. (1995) Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 307–322. doi:  10.1093/applin/16.3.307 https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/16.3.307
  • Lu, X. (2012) The Relationship of lexical richness to the quality of ESL learners’ oral narratives. The Modern Language Journal, 96(2), 190–208. doi:  10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2011.01232.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01232.x
  • MacWhinney, B. (2000) The CHILDES Project: Tools for analyzing talk (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Martínez Arbelaiz, A. (2004) Índices de progreso en la producción escrita de estudiantes de español en situación de inmersión. Revista Electrónica de Lingüística Aplicada, 3, 115–145.
  • Mavrou, I. (2013) Precisión lingüística y complejidad sintáctica: ¿hasta qué punto compiten entre sí por los recursos limitados del aprendiz?Revista Nebrija de Lingüística Aplicada a la Enseñanza de Lenguas, 14, 75–91.
  • (2015) Análisis factorial exploratorio: Cuestiones conceptuales y metodológicas. Revista Nebrija de Lingüística Aplicada a la Enseñanza de Lenguas, 19, 71–80. doi:  10.26378/rnlael019283 https://doi.org/10.26378/rnlael019283
  • Mavrou, I. (2016) Complejidad, precisión, fluidez y léxico: Una revisión. Moderna språk, 110(1), 49–69.
  • McCarthy, P. M. , y Jarvis, S. (2007) Vocd: A theoretical and empirical evaluation. Language Teaching, 24(4), 459–488. doi:  10.1177/0265532207080767 https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532207080767
  • (2010) MTLD, vocd-D, and HD-D: A validation study of sophisticated approaches to lexical diversity assessment. Behavior Research Methods, 42(2), 381–392. doi:  10.3758/BRM.42.2.381 https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.2.381
  • Meara, P. M. , y Miralpeix, I. (2007) Vocabulary size estimator. Swansea: Lognostics.
  • Meara, P. M., y Miralpeix, I. (2016) Tools for vocabulary research. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781783096473 https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783096473
  • Mohammadzadeh Mohammadabadi, A. , Dabaghi, A. , y Tavakoli, M. (2013) The effects of simultaneous use of pre-planning along +/−Here-and-Now dimension on fluency, complexity, and accuracy of Iranian EFL learners’ written performance. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 2(3), 49–65. doi:  10.5861/ijrsll.2012.168 https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrsll.2012.168
  • Moreno, A. (1991) Un modelo computacional para el análisis y generación de la morfología del español (Tesis doctoral inédita, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid). Disponible en: https://repositorio.uam.es/handle/10486/12294
  • Moreno, A. , y Goñi, J. M. (1995) GRAMPAL: a morphological processor of Spanish implemented in Prolog. En M. Alpuente y M. I. Sessa (Eds.), Proceedings of Joint Conference on Declarative Programming (GULP-PRODE 95) (pp.321–331). Salerno, Italy: Palladio Editrice.
  • Muñoz, C. (2006) The effects of age on foreign language learning: The BAF Project. En C. Muñoz (Ed.), Age and the rate of foreign language learning (pp.1–40). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781853598937‑003 https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853598937-003
  • Nariman-Jahan, R. , y Rahimpour, M. (2011) The effects of planning and proficiency on language production of writing task performance. Educational Research, 2(9), 1528–1537.
  • Navés, T. (2007, abril). Analytical measures of learners’ written interlanguage. Comunicación presentada en el XXV Congreso Internacional de AESLA, Universidad de Murcia, España.
  • Navés, T. , Torras, M. R. , y Celaya, M. L. (2003) Long-term effects of an earlier start. En S. Foster-Cohen y S. Pekarek (Eds.), EUROSLA-Yearbook. Annual Conference of the European Second Language Association (pp.103–130). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
  • Ortega, L. (2003) Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A research synthesis of college-level L2 writing. Applied Linguistics, 24(4), 492–518. doi:  10.1093/applin/24.4.492 https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.4.492
  • (2012) Interlanguage complexity: A construct in search of theoretical renewal. En B. Szmrecsanyi y B. Kortmann (Eds), Linguistic complexity: Second language acquisition, indigenization, contact (pp.127–155). Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110229226.127 https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110229226.127
  • Palloti, G. (2009) CAF: defining, refining and differentiating constructs. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 590–601. doi:  10.1093/applin/amp045 https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp045
  • Rahimpour, M. , y Hosseini, P. (2010) The impact of task complexity on L2 learners’ written narratives. English Language Teaching, 3(3), 198–205. 10.5539/elt.v3n3p198 https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v3n3p198
  • Richards, B. (1987) Type/token ratios: what do they really tell us?Journal of Child Language, 14(2), 201–209. doi:  10.1017/S0305000900012885 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900012885
  • Richards, B. , y Malvern, D. (2000, September). Measuring vocabulary richness in teenage learners of French. Comunicación presentada en British Educational Research Association Conference, Cardiff University.
  • Rietveld, T. , y van Hout, R. (1993) Statistical techniques for the study of language and language behaviour. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110871609 https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110871609
  • Roberto, J. A. , Martí, M. A. , y Salamó, M. (2012) Análisis de la riqueza léxica en el contexto de la clasificación de atributos demográficos latentes. Procesamiento de Lenguaje Natural, 48, 97–104.
  • Salimi, A. , y Fatollahnejad, S. (2012) The effects of strategic planning and topic familiarity on Iranian intermediate EFL learners’ written performance in TBLT. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(11), 2308–2315. doi:  10.4304/tpls.2.11.2308‑2315 https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.11.2308-2315
  • Schmidt, R. W. (1992) Psychological mechanisms underlying second language fluency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14(4), 357–385. doi:  10.1017/S0272263100011189 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100011189
  • Šišková, Z. (2012) Lexical richness in EFL students’ narratives. University of Reading Language Studies Working Papers, 4, 26–36.
  • Skehan, P. (2003) Task-based instruction. Language Teaching, 36(1), 1–14. doi:  10.1017/S026144480200188X https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144480200188X
  • (2009) Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 510–532. doi:  10.1093/applin/amp047 https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp047
  • Skehan, P. , y Foster, P. (1997) Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. Language Teaching Research, 1(3), 185–211. doi:  10.1177/136216889700100302 https://doi.org/10.1177/136216889700100302
  • (2001) Cognition and tasks. En P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp.181–205). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524780.009 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524780.009
  • Sotillo, S. M. (2000) Discourse functions and syntactic complexity in synchronous and asynchronous communication. Language Learning & Technology, 4(1), 82–119.
  • Torras, M. R. , y Celaya, M. L. (2001) Age-related differences in the development of written production. An empirical study of EFL school learners. International Journal of English Studies, 1(2), 130–126.
  • Torres González, A. N. (1993) Madurez sintáctica en estudiantes no universitarios de la zona metropolitana de Tenerife (Tesis doctoral, Universidad de La Laguna, Tenerife). Disponible en: dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/tesis?codigo=463
  • Torres González, A. N. (1997) Complejidad sintáctica en escritores de las islas canarias. REALE, 8, 105–125.
  • Torres López, M. C. (1999) Índices primarios de madurez sintáctica: análisis comparativo en alumnos de COU. REALE, 12, 93–118.
  • Towell, R. , y Dewaele, J. M. (2005) The role of psycholinguistic factors in the development of fluency amongst advanced learners of French. En J. M. Dewaele (Ed.), Focus on French as a foreign language: Multidisciplinary approaches (pp.210–239). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781853597688‑011 https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853597688-011
  • Treffers-Daller, J. (2013) Measuring lexical diversity among L2 learners of French: an exploration of the validity of D, MTLD and HD-D as measures of language ability. En S. Jarvis y M. Daller (Eds.), Vocabulary knowledge: Human ratings and automated measures (pp.79–104). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.47.05ch3 https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.47.05ch3
  • Unsworth, N. , y Engle, R. W. (2006) Simple and complex memory spans and their relation to fluid abilities: Evidence from list-length effects. Journal of Memory and Language, 54(1), 68–80. doi:  10.1016/j.jml.2005.06.003 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.06.003
  • (2007) On the division of short-term and working memory: An examination of simple and complex span and their relation to higher order abilities. Psychological Bulletin, 133(6), 1038–1066. doi:  10.1037/0033‑295X.114.1.104 https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.104
  • Vajjala, S. , y Meurers, D. (2012, June). On improving the accuracy of readability classification using insights from second language acquisition. Comunicación presentada en7th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications, The Association for Computational Linguistics, Montréal, Canada.
  • Véliz, M. (1996) Recurrencia textual y competencia narrativa en escolares de educación básica y media. REALE, 5, 107–126.
  • Véliz, M. (1999) Complejidad sintáctica y modo del discurso. Estudios Filológicos, 34, 181–192.
  • Vercellotti, M. L. (2012) Complexity, accuracy, and fluency as properties of language performance: The development of the multiple subsystems over time and in relation to each other (Tesis doctoral inédita, University of Pittsburgh). Disponible en: d-scholarship.pitt.edu/12071/1/Vercellotti_CAF_v3.pdf
  • Weir, C. J. (2005) Language testing and validation: An evidence-based approach. Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230514577 https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230514577
  • Wolfe-Quintero, K. , Inagaki, S. , y Kim, H. Y. (1998) Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy & complexity (Technical Report 17). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
  • Yang, W. , y Sun, Y. (2015) Dynamic development of complexity, accuracy and fluency in multilingual learners’ L1, L2 and L3 writing. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(2), 298–308. doi:  10.17507/tpls.0502.09 https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0502.09