La parlamentarización del sistema político de la Unión Europeasus consecuencias para la legitimidad

  1. Priego Moreno, Alberto
  2. Abad Quintanal, Gracia
Zeitschrift:
Cuadernos europeos de Deusto

ISSN: 1130-8354

Datum der Publikation: 2015

Titel der Ausgabe: Renovación institucional en la Unión Europea. ¿Esta vez fue diferente?

Nummer: 52

Seiten: 17-37

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.18543/CED-52-2015PP17-37 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen Access editor

Andere Publikationen in: Cuadernos europeos de Deusto

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

Zusammenfassung

The European Union is a rigid political system established with the creation of the ECSC. Its reform is difficult because two different sensibilities coexist: the Functional/Communitarian and Constitutional one. However, the EU needs to reform its institutions in order to adapt them to the new international order, the only option for reform being the addition of elements borrowed from the classical political systems, both parliamentary and presidential. Until now, most of the elements adopted have been parliamentary in nature. This could benefit EU legitimacy, as parliamentary systems are more common in Europe and are, therefore, perceived as more legitimate by the Europeans.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • ABAD, G., «Mayo 2014: Las elecciones del desencanto» The Economy Journal, Mayo 2014, pp. 21-24.
  • AHIJADO, M., Historia de la unidad europea. Desde los precedentes remotos a la ampliación al Este, Ediciones Pirámide, Madrid, 2000.
  • AJANI, G., ANDERSON, M., ARROYO-AMAYUELAS, E. and PASA., Sis-tema jurídicos comparados. Ed. Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, 2010, p. 102.
  • ÁLVAREZ, M. I., «Constitución de Francia» Revistas de la Cortes Generales, n.º 75, Tercer Cuatrimestre, 2008, pp. 388-446.
  • ÁLVAREZ, M. I., y ALCÓN, F., «El Parlamento Europeo. Notas sobre la Repre-sentación Política y los Sistemas Electorales» Revista de Derecho Político,n.º 52, 2001, pp. 323-354.
  • BUTKOVIC, «How is Democracy Applied within the EU:Combining Elements of Traditional and Innovative Democratic Practice», Politička misao, Vol. 47, No. 5, 2010, pp. 27-43.
  • CAPORASO, J.,«The European Union and Forms of State: Westphalian, Regula-tory or Post-Modern?» Journal of Common Market Studies, Volume 34, Issue 1, 1996, pp. 22-55.
  • FORNER, S. (ed.) La construcción de Europa. De las guerras civiles a la unifica-ción. Biblioteca Nueva. Insituto Alicantino de Cultura Juan Gil-Albert, Madrid, 2007.
  • GRAJAUSKAS, R., and KASCIUNAS, L., «Modern versus Postmodern Actor of International Relations: Explaining EU-Russia Negotiations on the New Part-nership Agreement», Lithuanian Foreign Policy Review, 2009 (22).
  • HAGUE, R., & HARROP, M., Comparative Government and Politics. An Intro-duction. Palgrave, London, 2011.
  • HAMILTON, A., The Federalist Papers, An Electronic Classic Series Publication, Pennsylvania State University, 1998.
  • McSWEENEY, B., Moral Issues in International Affairs, MacMillan, New York/Cambridge, 1998.
  • MONTALVO, Federico y CORREAS, Irene «Cincuenta años de presidencialismo en Europa: la evolución del semipresidencialismo» de la V República» Revista ICADE, n.º 83-84, Especial 50 aniversario, 2011, pp. 379-402.
  • MORAVCSIK, A., «New Statecraft? Supranational Entrepreneurs and International Cooperation» International Organization, vol 53, n.º 2, Spring 1999, pp. 267-306.
  • NEUNREITHER, K., and WIENER, A. (eds), European Integration after Amster-dam, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000.
  • NEUSTADT, R. E., Presidential Power and Modern Presidents: the Politics of Leadership from Roosevelt to Reagan, Free Press, New York and London, 1991.
  • NUGENTS, N., The Government and Politics of the European Union, Palgrave, MacMillan, 2010 (7th edition).
  • PASQUINO, G., Sistemas políticos comparados: Francia, Alemania, Gran Bre-taña, Italia y Estados Unidos. Prometeo Libros, Buenos Aires, 2004.
  • PETERSON, J., and SHACKLETON, M., The Institutions of the European Union, Ed Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012.
  • PINELLI, C., «The Discourses on Post-National Governance and the Democratic Deficit Absent an EU Government» European Constitutional Law Review, Sep-tember 2013, pp. 177-188.
  • PRIBAN, D., «The Self-Referential European Polity, its Legal Context and Sys-temic Differentiation: Theoretical Reflections on the Emergence of the EU’s Political and Legal Autopoiesis» European Law Journal, Vol. 15, No. 4, July 2009, pp. 442-461.
  • RIPOLLÉS, R. (coord.) Constituciones de los Estados Miembros de la Unión Euro-pea, Congreso de los Diputados, Madrid, 2011.
  • RITTBERGER, R., «Which institutions for post-war Europe? Explaining the insti-tutional design of Europe’s first community» Journal of European Public Pol-icy Vol. 8 Issue 5, October 2001, pp. 673-708.
  • SCHARPF, F.W., «The Joint-Decision Trap: Lessons from German Federalism and European Integration», Public Administration, No. 66, 1988, pp. 239-278.
  • SCOTTO, M., Las Instituciones Europeas, Le Monde-Salvat, Madrid, 1996.
  • STAAB, A., The European Union Explained, Indiana University Press, Bloomin-gon, 2012.
  • VILARIÑO, E., La construcción de la Unión Europea, Arco Libros, Madrid, 1996.
  • BOMBERG, E., PETERSON, J., and CORBETT, R., The European Union. How does it work?, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012.
  • BOIX, C and STOKES, S., The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2009.
  • CLOSA, C., Sistema Político de la Unión Europea, Editorial Complutense, Madrid, 1997.
  • DUVERGER, M., Les régimen semi-présidentiels, PUF, Paris, 1996.
  • LINZ, J.J. y VALENZUELA, A., Las Crisis del presidencialismo Alianza, Madrid, 2011.
  • MAYER, L., and PATTERSON, F., Contending Perspectives in Comparative Poli-tics, C.Q. Express-SAGE, Washington DC, 2009.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet